Sunday, October 14, 2007

Intermediary liability and the future of the Internet in India



"Intermediary liability" may sound like something you'd only hear about in a law school torts class, but its meaning is both important and easy for all Internet users to understand.

It's the principle that Internet middlemen -- like ISPs, website hosting companies, search engines, email services, social networks, and other neutral hosts of information sent, posted or uploaded by others -- should not be held legally liable for their users' content. Put another way, it's the principle that the person who created the content is the person deemed responsible for it, and that it would be both unjust and impractical to hold companies whose systems happen to automatically transmit or store the content responsible for words they didn't write, pictures they didn't take, or videos they didn't create.

Still puzzled? Think about the telephone system. We don't hold the telephone company liable when two callers use the phone lines to plan a crime. For the same reasons, it's a fundamental principle of the Internet that you don't blame the neutral intermediaries for the actions of their customers. Rather, the standard recognized worldwide is that Internet intermediaries are responsible to take action when they are put on notice of unlawful content through proper legal channels.

This principle has been the subject of much recent debate as India takes a fresh look at its technology laws.

The government of India is looking to amend the Information Technology Act of 2000, the law which governs the web. As I've written before, the Department of Information Technology's proposed amendment to Section 79 of the IT Act would mark a fundamental shift in Indian law as it relates to intermediary liability, and go a long way towards promoting innovation on the Internet.

Under the proposed amendment, intermediaries like Google would not be held responsible for problematic content on their systems that they did not create. Instead, intermediaries would be protected so long as they follow appropriate lawful process after being notified of the content in question (in the copyright context, this is known a "notice-and-takedown" regime). This principle has been embraced in all the leading democracies of the world.

Unfortunately, last month the Indian Parliament's Standing Committee on Information Technology issued its own report challenging this proposed amendment:

"...Under the proposed amendments, the intermediaries/service providers shall not be liable for any third party information data.... The Committee do not agree with this. What is relevant here is that when [the] platform is abused for transmission of allegedly obscene and objectionable contents, the intermediaries/service providers should not be absolved of responsibility. The Committee, therefore, recommend that a definite obligation should be cast upon the intermediaries/service providers in view of the immense/irreparable damages caused to the victims through reckless activities that are under taken in the cyberspace by using the service providers' platform. Casting such an obligation seems imperative...." (pp. 54-55)

While we thank the Committee for its hard work and thoughtful deliberations, we're troubled by this tone and line of thinking. If implemented, these recommendations would create a hostile environment in India for Internet services, and for the entrepreneurs and innovators working to create the next set of revolutionary Internet technologies for Indian users.

For intermediary websites to be held liable for the "reckless activities" of others is fundamentally unjust, ignores the origin of the content, misunderstands the size and scale of the Internet, and fails to appreciate the great benefits yielded to the vast majority of Indian users by these information platforms.

At Google we take issues like cybercrime, the transmission of illegal content, and its harm on victims very seriously. We work with government authorities to ensure Google's platforms in India are not used illegally and that they are in full compliance with our own terms and conditions. We also work diligently to ensure our own community standards (like orkut's, for example) are not violated on our sites.

It would be technologically infeasible for ISPs and web companies to pre-screen each and every bit of content being uploaded onto our platforms, especially as the amount of information coming online increases exponentially in India and around the world. More importantly, imposing such a burdensome standard would crush innovation, throttle Indian competitiveness, and prevent entrepreneurs from deploying new services in the first place, a truly unfortunate outcome for the growth of the Internet in India.

It is possible that this portion of the Committee's report is based on a misapprehension of the intent of the proposed amendment. Specifically, the Committee may have believed that the proposed amendment would provide absolute immunity to Internet intermediaries, and wished to stress the need for a clear obligation to react promptly when put on notice of unlawful content. If this was, in fact, the case, the Committee's intent, its report would be consistent with the proposed amendment, and in line with global best practices. If not, the Committee's position would likely result in the hobbling of the Internet in India. For that reason, we intend to seek clarification of the Committee's understandings and intent.

The choice for the Indian government is stark: If it wishes to enable Indians to have access to cutting-edge Internet services, and to promote innovation on the Internet, the Department of Information Technology should uphold the principle of qualified safe harbors for Internet intermediaries.

20 comments:

Karthikeyan Ramchel said...

well said... but god only knows when those decision making babu's would realize it...

sysman said...

This is usual oneside crying of ISPs, who does not want to be governed by regulations. Internet is bound to grow, whether google likes it or not. If google is unhappy and would like to quit/downscale, some one else will come.

What is the harm in "due diligence" being in main act against desired in guidelines, as said by MoIT. ISPs talk of self-regulation, which the committee rightly said as eye-wash. No self-regulation works anywhere, at least in India.

Further, Internet is much more than Telephone / Postal services, as anology given by ISPs. You can not compare apples and oranges.

Thanks to Mr. Rishi Jaitly for justifying his job as part of google team.

Rakesh Goyal

Naavi said...

The recommendations made by the Parliamentary committee are largely sensible and reverses the motivated amendments suggested by the Minstry earlier.

The Parliamentary committee deserves a strong appreciation for its efforts and recommendations.

Detailed comments are available at http://www.naavi.org on the mis conceptions created by the recent Times of India article.
Naavi

Naavi said...

Kindly make this part of the page display in English.

This is intelligebile to a large section of population in India.

Naavi

docsharp01 said...

Interesting comments about the telephone system in India.
Maybe they should consider a PBX Phone System because it offers cost savings on internal phone calls.

东东 said...

好想你枣
北京好想你枣
轴承
进口轴承
FAG轴承
NTN轴承
NSK轴承
SKF轴承
网站建设
网站推广
googel左侧优化
googel左侧推广
搜索引擎优化

dance said...

高級住宅earnest住宅・建築設計事務所・高級注文住宅・デザイン住宅|アーネストアーキテクツ
手形割引手形割引・ビジネスローン・不動産担保ローンのご相談はクレイリッシュへ。手形割引を始め、豊富なサービスを低金利でご紹介しております。

piaoren2008 said...

铜米机

whymoto said...

子犬 東京子犬 東京
バンタン
通信制高校通信制高校
サイドビジネス
ミステリーショッパー
復縁復縁
新築マンション
ファッション 学校
ヘアメイク 専門学校ヘアメイク 専門学校
インテリア 学校インテリア 専門学校

whymoto said...

高級住宅 earnest リッジリングにドイツリングを選ぶ。それは一生涯を共にするのに相応しい価値ある逸品。 ドイツリング専門店ヘルディンヘルト">
為替

手形割引手形割引・ビジネスローン・不動産担保ローンのご相談はクレイリッシュへ。手形割引を始め、豊富なサービスを低金利でご紹介しております。
競馬競馬 人材派遣人材派遣会社の富士ゼロックスキャリアネット。ご希望にあう求人情報をお届けします。派遣で頑張るあなたを応援する、富士ゼロックス100%出資の人材派遣会社です

外国為替

whymoto said...

FX
FX・外国為替(外為)取引システムを、安心・安全・お気軽にご利用ください。FX商品情報も充実、株式会社エムジェイの公式サイト外為外為


不動産不動産
ペアリング リッジリングにドイツリングを選ぶ。それは一生涯を共にするのに相応しい価値ある逸品。 ドイツリング専門店ヘルディンヘルト">
出会い系出会い系サイトトラブル対処法! 大人なら引っかかりたくない出会い系サイトのトラブル対処法を紹介します。

ショッピング枠 現金化ショッピング枠 現金化
インプラントインプラントセンター・八王子は、インプラント治療に特化した万全の治療環境を備え、なおかつインプラント経験豊富な歯科医師が揃った、国内屈指の実績と成功を誇る歯科医院です。

whymoto said...

美容整形美容整形美容整形に携わる美容ドクター専門プロフサイト 美容の杜
ショッピング枠 現金化
外為
チューリッヒ
韓国ツアー

格安国内航空券
ブライダル
中高年 転職中高年 転職
不動産投資不動産投資

whymoto said...

出会い系
网络营销网络营销
网络推广网络推广
不動産 東京CATVにて住宅情報番組『住まなび』絶賛放映中!東京で不動産をお探しなら創業32年の信頼と実績、住建ハウジングにお任せ下さい。物件情報毎日更新中!東京 一戸建て一戸建て・土地・投資物件など25000件以上の物件を写真や動画でご紹介しております。


資格通信講座・通信教育・資格のZENKYOSHIN(全教振)のトップページ"

オーガニック

システムキッチンシステムキッチン
ペットショップ 東京
子犬 東京子犬 東京
バンタン

whymoto said...

通信制高校通信制高校
サイドビジネス
ミステリーショッパー
復縁復縁
新築マンション
ファッション 学校
ヘアメイク 専門学校ヘアメイク 専門学校
インテリア 学校インテリア 専門学校

said...

派遣情報サイトには、魅力的なお仕事をたくさん掲載しています。派遣お仕事をお探しの皆さまにとって、より使いやすく便利なサイトにするべく、アデコ派遣情報サイトをリニューアルしました。

said...

不動産 広島,岡山/四国(香川,徳島,愛媛,高知) 不動産 -あなぶき不産ナビ不動産四国4県、岡山の不動産、不動産広島の不動産など不動産情報検索(マンション・一戸建て・土地・収益物件等)サイトです不動産。穴吹不動産流通株式会社"

said...

外国為替
美容整形
外国為替
派遣会社
現金化
クレジットカード 現金化

said...

派遣
不動産
インプラント
出会いサイト
クレジットカード 現金化
FX

said...

出会い
投資
データ復旧
出会い系サイト
不動産
コンタクトレンズ
アフィリエイト

Preeti said...

Hi Rishi. I would like to contact you regarding a consultative meeting we are organising in Mumbai in Sept. on the role of internet cos. in helping to stop sex selection. May i have your email id or can we speak sometime? My cell no. is 0 98200 10052 and email id is: preeti.gc@populationfirst.org