Monday, June 8, 2009 at 4:06 PM ET
Open, ubiquitous broadband connectivity holds the promise to catapult America to the next level of competitiveness, productivity, education, health, and security -- but how do we get there from here?
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 requires the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to deliver to Congress a National Broadband Plan by February 2010. This represents a golden opportunity for policymakers and all Americans to take a hard look at the current state of broadband deployment and uptake, and begin laying the groundwork for a communications infrastructure truly capable of meeting the demands of the 21st century. Today Google submitted to the FCC our initial thoughts for how we might do just that.
As part of a comprehensive broadband policy framework, we believe that our government should adopt a bold yet achievable goal for making high-speed Internet capabilities available to each and every American. Our comments call for all American households to have access, by 2012, to at least 5 Mbps upload and download speeds over broadband. We believe that a 5 Mbps benchmark is an ambitious yet attainable first-step, and that even more challenging benchmarks with much higher capacity levels may well be necessary over the course of the next decade. If this benchmark is accomplished -- so that today's unserved or underserved consumers become tomorrow's broadband customers -- we will have truly become an always-on nation.
In addition to laying out a suggested public policy framework, our comments also describe four concrete proposals that we believe would help advance this vision:
- Install broadband fiber as part of every federally-funded infrastructure project. By some estimates nearly 90 percent of the cost of deploying fiber is associated with construction costs like tearing up and repairing roads. The National Broadband Plan should require the installation of broadband fiber as part of all new federally-funded infrastructure projects. Laying fiber -- or even simply installing the conduit for later fiber deployment, as Rep. Anna Eshoo has suggested -- during the construction or repair of roads and other public works projects will dramatically reduce deployment costs. And it's just good common sense.
- Deploy broadband fiber to every library, school, community health care center, and public housing facility in the United States. Low-income Americans are increasingly left out of the digital revolution. The National Broadband Plan should call for the deployment of high-speed fiber connections to every library, school, community health care center, and public housing facility in the country. This would create community hub centers nationwide, providing access to underserved populations and potentially acting as a springboard for more widespread broadband adoption in these communities.
- Create incentives for providers to install multiple lines of fiber as new networks are rolled out. The Commission should offer incentives to providers wishing to build new network infrastructure to lay cable containing multiple fibers. These unused fibers could in turn be leased or sold to other network operators, increasing competition along with deployment.
- Encourage greater wireless broadband and reduce barriers to deployment. Last November, the FCC paved the way for "white spaces" spectrum to be used to deliver better and faster wireless broadband connections to American consumers. The Commission should encourage use of unlicensed devices in "white spaces" spectrum by eliminating unnecessary requirements and easing interference standards in rural areas where no actual harmful interference would occur.
In developing a National Broadband Plan, the FCC has the opportunity to embark on a fresh course to ensure our nation's digital infrastructure fully meets our 21st century opportunities and challenges.

23 comments:
GOOD JOB GOOGLE!
Now use some of those billions to help us pay for it.
Sounds like the US is taking a step in the right direction, and it's encouraging to see Google backing, supporting and advising this development.
I read on BBC News that a similar project is under way here in the UK, with emphasis on increasing the speed in the major cities, through research into the efficiency of the next generation of cable technology. They mentioned testing speeds up to 1Gbs if I remember rightly!
screw the FCC! Just let google do it! (and pay for it)
Just great Google. You guys do EVERYTHING and it is so awesome
-From Rodcats Media www.rodcats.com
In mexico the electricity government company CFE develop the carriers of carriers with presence in 98% of the territory,and we have the theme of campaign internet free for alls for cover 50% of poverty population for training in world university free on line like OCWC.org,job and comunication in an emergency plan for 2012 or before. http://presidentetecnologicodemexico.blogspot.com
we are in the world Google Thanks you
We also need short or medium term solution to make media and internet services available to every citizen of the world.
Companies like Google can really help to create more hotspots, not just in US, but everywhere in the world, in partnership with local businesses and Governments or NGOs.
Really, just build a quad satallite that rotates and put them up about every 100 miles away from each other. They have a potential of reaching up to 150 to 200 miles distance and that is for a small satallite, imagine using the old 12' satallites on the same set up. You could reach up to 250-500 miles. No need for fiber optics or any wires period. Give everyone a broadband card, start taking away from the computers for everyone in other countrys. Give them to our kids, and there you go! Everyone has broadband, and everyone should have a computer.
I live in a place I like to call RRA: Really Rural America. While the proposals outlined here may help in underserved urban and suburban areas, there are some gaps if you believe that Really Rural Americans also deserve broadband. To begin with, the fiber in federally financed projects won't bring any of the stuff into our towns and roads, because RRA is spread out away from roads that are major enough to be involved with Federal highway funds. The nearest Interstate Highway from my house is more than 28 miles away, and I live in relatively dense New England. For Wyoming or Idaho, those distances could be even greater.
The essential Rural problem is that there aren't enough of us to make a profitable customer base for the infrastructure. Our town of 125 households doesn't represent an opportunity for utilities. If electrification hadn't been a government priority half a century ago, we'd still be reading by kerosene lantern.
Now only if we had good Wifi we won't need our choppy cell phone providers. We can skype our way into the future using basic WiFi phones. Seriously the cell phone tower reception sucks! I'm sure the money we spent overseas for the war could have cover this over 10 folds but who is counting their pennies at a time we we could afford millions each day to post troops in foreign soil.
HELP ME I ON DIAL UP AND CAN'T GET BROADBAND THAT DOESN'T SUCK
Taking Broadband To Every American: What Google And The Feds Can Do
That looks great.
As a residential "dsl" customer- (Who ever heard of 312k dsl?)
Do you think we will continue to have the internet as a pay for access plan or will there be viable options for those with limited resources?
What made television great was the availability to the masses without a monthly bill, yet $50 a month for internet is a tough pill to swallow for many American families.
I wish we could provide high quality internet to all kids (high school teacher here) that had computers.
What if we went wireless instead of wired- with public access?
i think in the public area they should use alternative browsers, mainly firefox, because firefox is supported, i'm not saying chrome, or safari is bad, but i think the public area should use alternatives browsers
Nice solutions!
I would really like to see wimax be avaliable to every person. The speed that google is looking to get would be easily acheved with a fiber backing. The effective range is five miles for each tower. The wimax service could be offered free if the users were asked to pay a rental fee for the wixmax basestation.
I do believe internet access will spur the growth of the United States. It has changed culture worldwide, and is sad to see people denied access due to geography. I support a plan to wire up the country, to bring access to a world of information to one in Burneyville, Oklahoma.
Why should "public housing" get free broadband? I don't get free broadband. I have to pay for it. Is there any incentive left to work in this country? If you're poor, you get free health care (Medicaid), free food (food stamps), free housing (public housing), free education (government schools), and free access to public parks. And now free broadband? What's next -- free cars, free clothing? There are $10 million mansions in Los Gatos or Woodside that don't get broadband, but people who refuse to work and live off the taxpayer should somehow have the rest of us pay for them to get broadband? What has happened to this country?
Right, poor people are poor because they simply REFUSE TO WORK. There are so many jobs just sitting there waiting to be filled, if only people would go take them! Get real.
In regards to those that would say no to free broadband.
In education alone, how do schools better equip students to be technologically literate if we worry about a child's access to internet?
How do those same students access materials that require website posting, research, and interaction with peers?
Free internet sounds ridiculous to some and yes it would be abused in some cases, but wow! what if it were available to all.
We offer free access to our libraries online, why not in all homes?
I realize not all homes have computers- I would concede that we draw the line somewhere- families should provide their own computer.
I think the argument for free internet could be similar for the lack of tolls on interstate.
They are a product that benefit all users.
**Here's a wild idea- charge sales tax on internet transactions- then put that money towards providing public broadband.
(Local businesses would rejoice and equity would come to the internet.)
"If electrification hadn't been a government priority half a century ago, we'd still be reading by kerosene lantern."
I could draw a similar line to what broadband might mean to americans 50 years from now. It may seem like a novelty now, but somewhere along the line it blurs to necessity.
And I'll leave my 2 cents here as well. First, I'd like to say everyone has great opinions here. Google has put forth something. But there is a huge cost here. How to offset those costs would be first. We could not use pennies anymore, for instance. Doesn't it cost more to make a penny than it's worth? I hate the penny.
2nd, we have the greatest interstate infrastructer on Earth with China very rapidly closing in. Why not utilize already federal (basicly) property? Lay the fiber there, and use it like roads and hwys. They were all dirt at one point.
3rd, redudancy. Oh man, I can see it now, wreck on I-40 shuts down eastern seaboard broadband access. We need to use it all: satallite; old ma bell lines; cable lines; fiber lines. And it also is going to depend on local terrain. I like wifi the best, and it seems where everyone is headed anyway. We broadcast radio, TV, cell phones, and gps signals. Seems to me we could broadcast the interweb too. I think someone mentioned computers... well there is a solution in place. They have a laptop computer that someone has designed that has a crank. It lasts about 15 minutes or so. It relays the wifi signal to other people that have the same laptop. I know they use it in 3rd world countries. It costs a little less than $100. Just throwing it out there.
4th, whatever happened to the plan where they were going to pipe in the internet through electrical lines? That seems like a perfect solution to our real americans living out there in rural communities, at least until we get the light pipe to them.
Finally, I hope that something happens here. This could be what our courty is looking for. Something that people can invest in. Something people can earn a wage, and pay their bills, and feed their family with. Something that we can all look back on and say, "when I was your age, we had to pay for the internet." We live in the age of information, surely there is an answer out there.
And regulate Internet Service as a public utility. It clearly is one and we need to protect consumers.
Right on track Google...
Government Technologies - Digital Communities - Broadband Nation
Post a Comment