Thursday, October 29, 2009 at 6:05 PM ET
The need to address the climate crisis provides us with an unprecedented opportunity to rebuild our energy system with vast economic, security, and environmental benefits. By putting significant limits on carbon emissions –- and adopting strong complementary energy policies -- we can create millions of new U.S. jobs, reduce our dangerous dependence on foreign energy, and protect ourselves from a global climate crisis. Yesterday I testified on just this subject before the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Google published a scenario last year called Clean Energy 2030, which outlines one potential path to a clean energy future. The Clean Energy 2030 proposal would reduce U.S. CO2 emissions about 50% below the baseline projection, while creating 9 million new jobs and net savings of $800 billion.
The ability of the U.S. to seize this historic economic opportunity will be influenced, to a large extent, by actions taken by government to put a significant price on carbon emissions. But a significant price on carbon, while absolutely necessary, is not sufficient to address the climate problem and will not put the U.S. in the position to seize the extraordinary opportunities that will come with rebuilding the global energy economy.
There are four complementary energy policy mechanisms that will be critical to taking advantage of these opportunities:
- First, we must significantly increase public funding of research and development of advanced energy technologies. In 1980 ten percent of the total government R&D investment was in energy. Today, it is only two percent.
- Second, we must increase the capital available to deploy these advanced technologies at commercial scale.
- Third, we must build a smarter and bigger electric grid to better harness energy efficiency and renewable energy. A smarter grid will let us see and understand our energy use, measure it, price it and manage it -- to get the most out of every watt. And a bigger grid will allow us to tap our nation's vast clean energy resources and deliver them where needed.
- Fourth, we must set national standards to accelerate the uptake of cleaner and more efficient technologies.

1 comments:
I understand why more funding of basic energy R&D might be necessary. Arguably the private sector just isn't able to do this efficiently. I also understand why the government might need to help industry overcome coordination problems to create a smart grid.
However, if a sufficient carbon tax is imposed this should drive the appropriate investment in reduced carbon energy sources and eliminate the need for government fuel efficiency standards and the like as far as global warming is concerned. The whole point is that once you internalize the externalize then the most profitable choices are also the best choices.
Is this post assuming (correctly I imagine) that a carbon tax sufficent to internalize the full externalities of greenhouse gases is politically infeasible?
Post a Comment