Making Copyright Work Better Online: A Progress Report
Friday, September 2, 2011
In December, we announced four initiatives to tackle the problem of copyright infringement online. We’ve made considerable progress on each front, and we will continue to evolve our efforts in all four areas in the months to come.
- Acting on reliable copyright takedown requests within 24 hours. We promised to build tools to make it easier for rightsholders to submit DMCA takedown requests for Google products (starting with Blogger and Web Search), and to reduce our average response time to 24 hours or less for submissions using these new tools. We built the tools earlier this year, and they are now being successfully used by more than a dozen content industry partners who together account for more than 75% of all URLs submitted in DMCA takedowns for Web Search. Our response time for these partners is now well below the 24 hour target. In the coming months, we will be making these tools available more broadly to those who have established a track record of submitting valid takedown requests.
- Preventing terms that are closely associated with piracy from appearing in Autocomplete. Beginning in January, we started filtering terms closely associated with infringement from Google Autocomplete, our feature that predicts search queries based on popular searches from other users.
- Improving our AdSense anti-piracy review. We have always prohibited the use of our AdSense program on web pages that provide infringing materials, and we routinely terminate publishers who violate our policies. In recent months, we have worked hard to improve our internal enforcement procedures. In April, we were among the first companies to certify compliance in the Interactive Advertising Bureau’s (IAB’s) Quality Assurance Certification program, through which participating advertising companies will take steps to enhance buyer control over the placement and context of advertising and build brand safety. In addition, we have invited rightsholder associations to identify their top priority sites for immediate review, and have acted on those tips when we have received them.
- Improving visibility of authorized preview content in search results. We have launched Music Rich Snippets, which allow legitimate music sites to highlight content in the snippets that appear in Google’s Web Search results. Rhapsody and MySpace are among the first to implement this feature, which has been developed using open web markup standards, and we are looking forward to more sites and search engines marking up their pages. We hope that authorized music sites will take advantage of Music Rich Snippets to make their preview content stand out in search results.
There is plenty more to be done, and we look forward to further refining and improving our processes in ways that help both rightsholders and users.
Nice words, but I'm not sure reality matches up. I've filed numerous DMCA notices with Google regarding AdSense ads on pirate websites and while the actual link of my film is removed, the site remains active and features both Google ads and thousands of illegal downloads. It's not rocket science to take one look at the site and note that it exists only to pirate illegal content (and make money from that activity).
ReplyDeleteI would also ask about the tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of Blogger sites that exist only as a portal for disseminating links to stolen content. When DMCA complaints are filed with Google regarding these sites the same thing happens. The suspect link is removed while the site is allowed to remain active and continue its pirate ways.
Also, I would ask Google what, if anything, it plans to do about the AdSense ads that populate the various cyber-locker websites. Everyone knows that the vast majority of content "shared" via these sites is comprised of stolen films, music, e-books, etc. Google plays a huge role in making these sites profitable. How about severing your connection to these sites that show NO interest in vetting uploaded content.
It seems Google has been forced to make some changes. Hopefully, they will become more proactive to ensure that their profits are legitimate.
I like the cut of your jib Google. And by "cut" I mean "responsible without curtailing free speech" and by "jib" I mean "jib."
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete